Abstract: The pseudo-random number generators (PRNGs), sampling algorithms, and algorithms for generating random integers in some common statistical packages and programming languages are unnecessarily inaccurate, by an amount that may matter for statistical inference. Most use PRNGs with state spaces that are too small for contemporary sampling problems and methods such as the bootstrap and permutation tests. The random sampling algorithms in many packages rely on the false assumption that PRNGs produce IID U[0,1) outputs. The discreteness of PRNG outputs and the limited state space of common PRNGs cause those algorithms to perform poorly in practice. Statistics packages and scientific programming languages should use cryptographically secure PRNGs by default (not for their security properties, but for their statistical ones), and offer weaker PRNGs only as an option. Software should not use methods that assume PRNG outputs are IID U[0,1) random variables, such as generating a random sample by permuting the population and taking the first k items or generating random integers by multiplying a pseudo-random binary fraction or float by a constant and rounding the result. More accurate methods are available.

# Random Sampling: Practice Makes Imperfect

**Philip B. Stark, Kellie Ottoboni**

arXiv.org

October 26, 2018

### Featured Fellows

#### Philip Stark

Statistics; Statistical Computing Facility

Co-I for Moore/Sloan Data Science Environments